Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Pierre's avatar

"For cloud based copilot generation workflows, CodeQL will get called as part of the pull request, checking for SAST vulnerabilities in the generated code. Copilot will then remediate any findings. GitHub is bringing these capabilities first to cloud generated code where the UX challenges will be less apparent. On the one hand, this promises a future where code security happens before the developer even sees the code. On the other, I haven’t found the workflow of calling a SAST tool via MCP to lead to great results when testing other tools."

It was great to meet you at Universe and have a deeper chat about our new features 🔐. Awesome to see our momentum reflected in your write-up 🤩.

I do agree that a simple MCP call rarely leads to good results. That's why we've baked all of our security checks (CodeQL, dependency vulnerabilities, secret scanning, and code review) into Coding Agent's underlying platform, invoking some of them at deterministic checkpoints, and some throughout the agent workflow - for all Coding Agent runs - even custom agents. We see this lead to much better outcomes in production than bolted-on solutions, and we've got plenty of ideas on how to improve this even further as we build out the agent platform 🚀.

Expand full comment

No posts

Ready for more?